In this instance, we report on three comparisons:
(i) the frequency distributions of all interior cells in MG101 that are actually subject to SCAM;
(ii) the frequency distribution of overall totals in MG101 that are the most commonly used values and are sums of SCAMed cells; and
(iii) the totals by age and sex between MG101 and MG201, e.g. at district and ward level